Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Reese

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 2, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

In this accounting proceeding a question arises as to the amount of income which is payable to the widow as life tenant of the residuary trust. Counsel for the widow contends that the method of computation laid down in Matter of Benson (96 N. Y. 499) should not be followed, and argues that the gross income earned during the period of administration should be paid to the life tenant. These contentions must be overruled. The rule of ascertainment of income in the Benson case has been uniformly followed by the surrogates and the appellate courts in arriving at the true residue of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. WilliamsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Matter of Accounting of BensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. In re the Estate of LordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  4. In re the Estate of PhillipsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  5. In re the Estate of EmeryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central National Bank v. CoyleCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of FosterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API