In Re Hague for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
On the ultimate question whether the order brought up should be reversed, the court is equally divided in opinion, and for want of a majority for reversal it will be affirmed.
At the request of the judges the following questions are ordered to be voted upon separately:
1. Is Joint Eesolution No. 13, taken as a whole, a valid exercise of legislative power, even if some one or more of the inquiries suggested therein may be unlawful ?
3. Was the subpoena lawfully issued, and did it lawfully require Mayor Hague’s attendance before the committee notwithstanding the assumed inclusion therein of…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Robinson v. FluentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. PlevaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- In Re StegmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- John Paff v. Ocean County Prosecutor's OfficeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.