Legal Opinion

Bernbeck v. Moore

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided August 15, 1996No. 4:CV96-3263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

This case presents the question of whether the efforts of the Nebraska legislature to statutorily limit the right to initiate changes in the state constitution by circulating petitions infringe upon Plaintiffs’ federal constitutional rights. The Nebraska legislature has enacted legislation prohibiting and criminalizing the circulation of initiative petitions by persons who have not been registered to vote for one month prior to the circulation of the petitions. See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 82-629, 32-630, 32-1404, 32-1546 (Miehie 1995).

Plaintiffs allege in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kent Bernbeck Stan Dobrovolny Richard Bellino Angela L. Crouse Gwen Kutschkau, Betty Cowart v. Scott A. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Dobrovolny v. NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2000
  3. Kent Bernbeck v. Scott A. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Opinion No. (1997), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1997
  5. Opinion No. (2008), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API