Legal Opinion
United States v. ONE 1977 PONTIAC GRAND PRIX, VIN 2J5747P137057
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 31, 1979No. 78 C 3521PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DECKER, District Judge.
The government has moved for summary judgment in this action to forfeit a 1977 Pontiac Grand Prix, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881. Under this statute:
“(a) The following shall be subject to forfeiture to the United States and no property right shall exist in them:
“(4) All conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles, or vessels, which are used, or are intended for use, to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the transportation, sale; receipt, possession, or concealment of [controlled substances].”
The question before the court is whether there…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. One 1972 Toyota Mark II Vin Rt 63016188, Marjorie Von WeiseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. ONE 1976 BUICK SKYLARK, ETC.District Court, D. Colorado · 1978
- United States v. One 1973 Dodge Van, VIN B21AE3X095937, Bearing 1973 Michigan License 4037 EUDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
- United States v. One 1973 Jaguar Coupe Serial No. 1573953District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ManuelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- United States v. Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Property Identified as 3120 Banneker Drive, N.E.District Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- United States v. One Rural LotDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1990
- United States v. 8848 South Commercial St., Chicago, Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.