Legal Opinion
Earley v. Executive Board of the United Transportation Union
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 31, 1997No. 1:94cv0597, 1:94cv0674PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ECONOMUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the request of Plaintiff, Robert W. Earley (“Ear-ley”) for a permanent injunction. Earley has alleged violations of the Federal Wiretap Act (“Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et. seq., as well as related state law claims. Earley seeks to prevent Defendants from commencing a trial of an intra-union charge against him for breach of duty based upon a tape recording which was made without his knowledge or permission. A hearing regarding the permanent injunction was held on May 31, 1996.
FACTS
Earley is a Vice President of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Falcone v. DantinneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Joyce M. Fultz v. Larry Edward GilliamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- National Interstate Insurance v. PerroDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenneth R. Smoot v. United Transportation Union Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Holland v. LTV Steel Co. (In re LTV Steel Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002