Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Kansas
OPINION ON MOTION TO AMEND MANDATE. Appeal from McPherson district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.
1Per curiam
The plaintiff sued the defendants for the price of a silage cutter. The answer stated no defense, and the plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings. This motion was denied by the trial court, and the plaintiff appealed. This court held that the plaintiff’s motion should have been sustained, and our mandate to that effect was sent to the district court. (Thresher Co. v. Nelson, 105 Kan. 517, 184 Pac. 982.) Thereafter the defendants obtained leave of the trial court to file an amended answer, and at the same time that court made a finding that it could not determine from our mandate whether…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Miller v. Sunflower Recreation SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Burton v. MellorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Sentney v. Central Cattle Loan Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- McBroom v. WilgusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.