Legal Opinion

Mary Starks v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 18, 2022No. 2:21-cv-05209Unknown

1Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-05209-ODW-GJS Document 22 Filed 01/18/22 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:381 O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 MARY STARKS, individually and as Case № 2:21-cv-05209-ODW (GJSx) successor in interest to Decedent RICKIE 12 STARKS, ORDER CONDITIONALLY 13 GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 14 Plaintiff, MOTION TO STAY [14] AND 15 DENYING AS MOOT v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 16 DISMISS [13] 17 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff Mary Starks, individually and as successor in interest to Decedent 22 Rickie Starks,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. BhatiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API