Legal Opinion

Poyser v. Stangland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1952No. 28,904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilkison, J.

Appellant brought her action in the trial court to enjoin the appellees from proceeding with the collection of an assessment of $42.35 and a penalty of $4.24, a total sum of $46.59, levied against her land as the cost of constructing her part of a partition fence in Noble County. The fence had been built by the township agreeable with the partition fence law, §§30-201 to 30-212 inclusive, Burns’ 1949 Replacement.

Appellant contends that the assessment is unlawful, and that the portion of the fence constructed by the township trustee was not her part of the line fence.

Appellees take the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bettenbrock v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Nafe v. LeiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Smith v. State ex rel. CamblinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Horizon BancorpIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Meade Electric Co., Etc. v. Hagberg Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. New Trend Beauty School, Inc. v. Indiana State Board of Beauty Culturist ExaminersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Town of Schererville v. VavrusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Schwartzkopf v. State Ex Rel. FettigIndiana Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API