Legal Opinion

Seader v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1946No. Appeals, 160 and 161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The appeals are from a judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

Conrad F. Seader, twelve years of age, was killed by a large truck and trailer owned and operated by the City of Philadelphia. Suit was instituted by the administrator of the decedent and by his father and mother against the City charging the negligent operation of the vehicle. The jury rendered a verdict for plaintiffs, which the court set aside by its judgment for defendant n. o. v.

Viewing the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the salient facts may be stated as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dorris v. Bridgman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Barton v. CraighillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Osterheldt v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tanner v. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API