Wilson v. Pannell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
(after stating the facts). The judgment of the circuit court sustaining Mrs. Pannell’s plea of res judicata was correct. A comparison of the statement of facts made by the court in the suit brought in equity by Wilson against Mrs. Pannell to quiet his title to the lot with t.lie statement of facts in the present case will show that they are in all essential respects the same.
In the equity case Mrs. Pannell defended on the ground that she had the equitable title to the lot in controversy, and for that reason Wilson could not prevail in his suit to quiet title. The court dismissed the complaint…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daniel v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
- Wales-Riggs Plantations v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Wilson v. PannellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hicks v. NorsworthySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928