Miner v. Lorman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. ' The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the former reports of the case.
1Opinion of the CourtMoRsb, J.
This is the third time this case has been here before us. It will be found reported in 56 Mich. 212, and in 59 Id. 480; and we deem it unnecessary to again state the facts of the case in detail.
The action is based upon an alleged settlement of partnership accounts between the parties. The plaintiff introduced in evidence a memorandum purporting to be drawn from the books of the firm by one Sanderson, from which it was claimed the settlement was made. The defendant objected to its being admitted in evidence as incompetent and immaterial. The plaintiff testified that they made the settlement…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miner v. LormanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stratton v. DoleNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Miller v. MichelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Larson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Patton v. LundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Cassandra Harris v. Genesee CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017