Malberg v. Cashen
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MARTIN MALBERG, Case No. 22-cv-04386-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. RECUSAL 10 ROBERT CASHEN, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Martin Malberg’s motion for recusal. Mot., ECF No. 22. 14 Plaintiff’s motion attaches a declaration stating the basis for Plaintiff’s request. Id. at 2-3. For the 15 reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 16 Plaintiff’s motion for recusal is governed by
28 U.S.C. §§ 144
and 455. Section 144 17 provides for recusal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Esteban Azhocar, United States of America v. Alfred Esteban AzhocarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Rita A. Toth, and Sondra J. Thornally, Esq., Claimant-Appellant v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Karl J. BrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Beverly B. MannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Anthony R. Martin-TrigonaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.