Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Luis Herrera Guiterrez and Jose Herrera Nieto

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 4, 1977No. 77-1034PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants seek review of the denial of their motion to reduce sentence under Fed. R.Crim.P. 35. As recorded in the docket entry, the court denied the motion December 1, 1976. Appellants filed a notice of appeal December 15, 1976. Under Fed.R. App.P. 4(b), the appeal was untimely.

A rule 35 motion is a proceeding in the original criminal prosecution. See Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 418 n.7, 79 S.Ct. 451, 3 L.Ed.2d 407 (1959). Accordingly, the 10 day limitation of Fed.R. App.P. 4(b) governs. Appellants’ counsel may be charged with knowledge of the difference between a rule 35 motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Edison JordanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Jack Leon LucasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows, A/K/A TeddyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Howard Eugene AwaltCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. James Joseph Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API