Legal Opinion

State v. Maves

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1984No. 14371-14373PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Justice.

Defendants appeal from their convictions on a charge of perjury. We affirm.

Defendants, who are brothers and sister, were charged by separate informations with having committed perjury on May 21, 1982, during the trial of defendant Gerald Maves on a charge of grand theft.

The information filed against defendant Gerald Maves stated in part:

That Gary Foster a/k/a “Tattoo Gary” a/k/a “Tattoo” was present in the Lantern Lounge in the City of Brookings, South Dakota, on the 27th day of November, 1981, sometime between the hours-of 6:00 o’clock p.m. and 8:00 o’clock p.m. and that on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. State v. ReddingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. Iron ShellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. RufenerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. DixonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HoenscheidSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. HonomichlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API