Briglio v. Holt & Jeffery
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered October 9, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs for $2,500, for personal injuries caused by blasting.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
We shall refer to the party Luisa Briglio as the respondent. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion written1 on the former appeal (Briglio v. Holt & Jeffery, 85 Wash. 155, 147 Pac. 877), with the exception that, at the second trial, one of the physicians who had been familiar with the case testified that long association and continued observation warranted- the belief that the injury which Mrs. Briglio had sustained was due to the loosening or misplacement of the sacroiliac joint.
It is assigned as error that the court charged the jury that appellant was bound to use…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Briglio v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Abrams v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Freebury v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Klock Produce Co. v. Diamond Ice & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Child v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Simpson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Young v. Travelers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.