Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Reed

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. Suit by Gardner K. Wilder against W. I. Eeed. From an order making an allowance to the receiver’s counsel, defendant appealed. The respondent moved to dismiss the appeal.

1Per curiam

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. A suit was begun to dissolve a partnership and for an- accounting, and a decree was rendered therein as prayed for, whereupon a receiver was appointed, who employed counsel to aid him in the discharge of his trust. Prior to the final settlement the attorneys so engaged petitioned the court for an allowance of $250 as compensation for their services, in support of which an affidavit was filed by the receiver, but the transcript does not show that the creditors of the partnership ever had notice of the application. The defendant filed an objection to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Baker v. Williams Banking Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. In re Osburn's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. First National Bank v. Oregon Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Joost v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API