San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge Randolph.
Pillard, Circuit Judge:
*130 Petitioner San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) seeks review of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) declaratory order applying FERC's cancelled or abandoned electricity transmission facilities incentive, 18 C.F.R. § 35.35 (d)(1)(vi) (Abandonment Incentive), only prospectively, to investment that had yet to occur. FERC grants the Abandonment Incentive to qualifying transmission infrastructure projects to facilitate financing by assuring that ratepayers may be charged for the project if…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Baltimore Gas and Electric Company v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Belmont Municipal Light Department v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Industrial Energy Consumers of America v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
- International Transmission Company v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.