Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 22, 1992No. 954, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

In terms of popular and frequently recurring issues in criminal cases, even a cursory survey of the year’s docket confirms what our senses have already told us. The voguish “Contention of the Year” for the September, 1991 Term has been that defendants are entitled to a broader scope of inquiry during the jury selection process than is typically allowed. Consistently (largely in unreported opinions), we have rejected the contention. Persistently, it continues to appear. In the hope of some relief, we here reaffirm — categorically and for reporting — the well-settled limits that…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. In Re: Tsarnaev v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  4. Sivells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. McCracken v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API