Legal Opinion
Stumm v. Town of Pittsboro
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 14, 2018No. 1:17-cv-04296-JMS-MJDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Chief Judge
The three Plaintiffs in this case - Matthew Stumm, Jason Stumm, and Brian Helmer - are current or former Pittsboro police officers who allege that the Chief of *753Police, the Assistant Chief of Police, and a Captain with the neighboring Plainfield Police Department recorded or intercepted their conversations without their knowledge and without a court order in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Federal Wiretap Act, 18 U. S. C. § 2510, et seq. Presently pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. [Filing No. 41.] For the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Otis Grant v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peters v. Mundelein Consolidated High School District No. 120District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- TAYLOR v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICEDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019