Legal Opinion
The Gillette Company v. George P. Kempel, Doing Business as Shush Mfg. Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 23, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6331PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner, acting for the Commissioner of Patents, 110 USPQ 324, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing an opposition by appellant, the Gillette Company, to an application by appellee, George P. Kempel, doing business as Shush Mfg. Co., for registration of “Shush” as a trademark for a portable kit containing a disposable syringe, a disposable douche bag, and douche chemical preparations. Appellee’s application was filed October 17, 1952, and alleges October, 1, 1952, as the date of first use of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roger & Gallet v. Janmarie, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- The May Department Stores Company v. Schloss Bros. & Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Charles of the Ritz, Inc. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- General Baking Co. v. Commander-Larabee Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
3Cited by14 opinions
- Roux Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Erich Specht v. Google IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- J. C. Hall Company v. Hallmark Cards, IncorporatedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Sidney J. Friedman, D.B.A. Wyandotte Mattress Company v. Sealy, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Louis Rich, Inc. v. Horace W. Longacre, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.