Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1941No. O-3315Published

1Opinion of the Court

HonorableKing Fiks c0uat.v Attorney EU-tluycoumty DAlhart,Teras Dear Sir: OpinionNo.O-3315 Ret Constructionof Arts. 7328 aJd 7290,V.A.C.S. We are in receiptof your letterof MProh 19, 1941 in whiah you requestthe opininnof this dsparhnaatasto the proper ooa&uotioa of Articles729% aad 7329 of Veraon'sAanotatedCivil Statutes. Suoh a oonst- ruatioais aeoessaryin order to~dstemiae whether or not the oolleotioaof delinqusatschool distriottaxer is Wrrad after tea years. It also requir- es 8 consideration of whether or noisArtiole 729% is a limittition statuteor is rather oae which forbidsthe.kiaging…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Sharrow v. . Inland Lines, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Erp v. TillmanTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. De Harn v. the Mexican National Ry. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Golson v. W. F. Covington Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API