Legal Opinion

Larson v. Great Northern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 3, 1925No. 24,510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante or a new trial.

Plaintiff’s intestate, a locomotive fireman, while in defendant’s employ, was killed under these circumstances: The engineer and fireman were called upon to operate an interstate freight train out of Superior, Wisconsin, a little after midnight of August 18, 1923. Neither man ordinarily worked upon this train, and they had never before worked together. After starting the train and before it got out of the yard limits, the engineer noticed that the locomotive headlight was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roach v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Fogarty v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Green v. Brainerd & Northern Minnesota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. Ingersoll v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Peterson v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Lee v. Construction Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API