Commercial National Bank v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fontron, J.:
These actions were brought to recover taxes which were paid under protest on intangible property. The plaintiff was denied recovery in both actions and has appealed. The appeals have been consolidated for hearing in this court.
None of the facts are in dispute. The Commercial National Bank of Kansas City, hereafter referred to as plaintiff or bank, is the Administrator with Will Annexed of the separate estates of Albert R. Jones and Mabel Neer Jones, both deceased. For the year 1958 the Albert R. Jones Estate had among its assets various…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Addington v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Kentucky Finance Company v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Meadville City v. Odd Fellows' HomeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- City of Johnson City v. Clinchfield RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Von Ruden v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
- McManaman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Maggiacomo v. DiVincenzoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.