Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1968No. 45,017, 45,018PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

These actions were brought to recover taxes which were paid under protest on intangible property. The plaintiff was denied recovery in both actions and has appealed. The appeals have been consolidated for hearing in this court.

None of the facts are in dispute. The Commercial National Bank of Kansas City, hereafter referred to as plaintiff or bank, is the Administrator with Will Annexed of the separate estates of Albert R. Jones and Mabel Neer Jones, both deceased. For the year 1958 the Albert R. Jones Estate had among its assets various…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Addington v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. Kentucky Finance Company v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  4. Meadville City v. Odd Fellows' HomeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. City of Johnson City v. Clinchfield RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Von Ruden v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. McManaman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Maggiacomo v. DiVincenzoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API