McDonald v. Bowen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice
I concur in most of the majority opinion and in some of the results reached where I cannot fully subscribe to the reasons given for reaching them. My principal disagreement with the majority relates to a specific purpose for which taxes levied and bond proceeds may be utilized.
At the outset, I should express my agreement that appellees were well advised to concede that one purpose included in the proposed petition was far too vague to form the basis for a tax levy under Amendment 18. That item was:
To accomplish any or all of the improvements authorized by the Amendment No. 18 Implementing Act…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Walton v. McDonald, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. AlpersSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Westbrook v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.