Legal Opinion

Creech v. Runnels

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1950No. 37696Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, P. J.

In this bill Runnels and wife seek to set aside, as having been procured through misrepresentations and fraud of Creech, a conveyance by them to him of mineral rights and royalties, dated December 9, 1939, and also to annul subsequent conveyances of such rights and royalties by Creech to appellants Hawkins and Terry. The bill was sworn to and did not waive answer under oath. Defendants, in their unsworn answer, denied all fraud on the part of Creech, and further set up that, even though Creech had been guilty of fraud, Hawkins and Terry knew nothing of it and were innocent purchasers for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hirsch v. Shafer, Schwartz & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API