Legal Opinion
Sterling Power Partners v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 13, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 5, 1996, declaring that defendant had no right to demand assurances of plaintiffs’ future performance of their obligations under several long-term agreements for the purchase of electricity, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court correctly determined that the transaction was not a sale of goods falling within the coverage of article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, and thus properly found inapplicable its provision for a right to demand assurances (UCC 2-609).
Nor is there any right to demand assurances…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schenectady Steel Co. v. Bruno Trimpoli General Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Schenectady Steel Co. v. Bruno Trimpoli General Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Norcon Power Partners, L.P., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Encogen Four Partners, L.P. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norcon Power Partners, L.P. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Norcon Power Partners, L.P., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016