Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1960No. 4991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

Appellant was charged with stealing a chain saw valued at more than $35. He was convicted on circumstantial evidence and sentenced to one year in the penitentiary. On appeal appellant insisted that the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Mack Henry, the owner of the chain saw, testified in substance to the following: I live three miles south of Salem, and I am the owner of a chain saw which was taken from my property on July 5, 1959, (Sunday) around 5 p.m.; later the saw was brought back to me by the deputy sheriff; I can…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Lackey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  3. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Burrell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API