Legal Opinion

Reddock v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1929No. 4 Div. 447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Upon the trial of this case in the Elba division of the circuit court of Coffee county no question was raised by plea, or otherwise, to tihe jurisdiction of that court. The defendant upon arraignment pleaded “not guilty” to the indictment, thus no question is here presented in this connection.

By express terms of the statute, Code 1923, § 8610, “it is a good ground for challenge [of a juror] by either party * * * that he is under twenty-one, or over sixty-five years of age." Subdivision 8.

It affirmatively appears from this record that, over strenuous objections and exceptions, this appellant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arp v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Letson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  2. Gardner v. BakerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Pittman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API