Legal Opinion

United States v. Gray

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided May 31, 2001No. 92-20301PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL

DONALD, District Judge.

Petitioner, Chauncy Gray, filed a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. Petitioner contends that the government, through the actions of Officer Richard Borgers (“Bor-gers”) and his alleged agent, Delbert Delano Brooks (“Brooks”), knowingly, intentionally, and willfully induced Shelly McCaster (“McCaster”) to testify falsely against Petitioner during Petitioner’s December 1994 trial. Even if the government did not actually know McCaster’s testimony was false, Petitioner argues that it should…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API