Legal Opinion

Neil v. Dow Law Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Felton. Houston superior court. April term, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

Where an equitable petition is defective because of a misjoinder of parties, the same is subject to a special demurrer filed at the first term; but the petition should not be dismissed on a motion in the nature of a general demurrer made at the trial term and based upon this ground alone. Tice v. Georgia Railroad &c. Co., 124 Ga. 459 (52 S. E. 916). Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willingham, Wright & Covington v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  2. Atlanta Coach Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Ferrell v. WightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Bryant v. Motors Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API