In re Schultz Dry Goods, Carpet & Ready-to-Wear Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Schultz Dry Goods, Carpet & Ready-to-Wcar Company, bankrupt. On petition of Marshall Field & Co. and other creditors to review decision of referee allowing certain claims.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VAIJCENBURGH, District Judge.
The question presented is whether notes aggregating $42,000 in favor of J. F. Moerschel, executed by Prank J. Dinhoff, and one note for $8,000, payable on its face to Emma C. Dinhoff, wife of Prank J. Dinhoff, and signed by the latter, should be allowed against the bankrupt estate. The referee admitted these claims, and it is to correct this alleged error that this petition for review is brought to this court.
All the notes to Moerschel are signed by Prank J. Dinhoff; that to Pmma C. Dinhoff is signed Schultz Dry Goods & Carpet Company, the predecessor of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sparks v. Dispatch Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Park Hotel Co. v. Fourth Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Merchants' Bank of Valdosta v. BairdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Bowen v. Needles Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Hunter v. GaranfloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edward Finch Co. v. RobieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- O'Bannon v. MoerschelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920