Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Keiper

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1949No. Appeal, 14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This appeal involves three successive revival proceedings based on a judgment which was a lien on the property of appellant, the terre-tenant, when the first writ of scire facias to revive was issued. The matter was heard before a judge without a jury who held that the first judgment entered on the scire facias to revive the original judgment was not valid under the Act of June 1, 1887, P. L. 289 (which amended the Act of March 26, 1827, P. L. 129), 12 PS §868, because the terre-tenant was not named in the writ of scire facias, and that the first revival being void the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Uhler v. MosesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Kefover v. HusteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Farmers National Bank & Trust Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Ellinger v. Krach (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warner v. Warner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1957
  2. North Pittsburgh Telephone Co. v. Klein, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API