Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bolt v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 3, 1930No. 12880Published

1ConcurrenceJustice BlEase

(concurring) : I do not think “the sole point in the case is whether a motorcycle is a motor-driven car within the terms of the policy,” as suggested by Mr. Justice Cothran. That question, however, is an important one, and it seems to be entirely new in this State. In considering it, however, there are some principles of law, well recognized by our Court, which we must keep in mind.

In Rawl v. Insurance Co., 94 S. C., 299, 77 S. E., 1013, 1014, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.), 463, Ann. Cas., 1915-A, 1231, Mr. Justice Woods, referring to the construction of an insurance policy, cited several of our cases…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Laporte v. North American Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. McKendree v. Southern States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  3. Wingo v. New Work Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  4. Rawl v. American Central Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Cato v. Atlanta & C. Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API