In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176
Supreme Court of Florida
1ConcurrenceLewis, J.
While I concur with the majority decision, I write separately to address two aspects of this process, the second of which also applies to the entire reapportionment process in general. First, I commend the parties for superb briefing of the issues, as well as the professional demeanor and articulate presentations during oral argument. The quality of legal representation has been exemplary and served to crystallize the issues presented to enable this Court and the parties to engage in a thoughtful and intelligent dialogue.
*687Second, it must be recognized that the elements and standards that must…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Askew v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- In Re Apportionment Law, Senate Joint Res. No. 1305Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General Re Standards for Establishing Legislative District BoundariesSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Smathers v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.