Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stern

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1987No. 551 Disciplinary Docket, 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

515 Pa. 68 (1987)

526 A.2d 1180

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

v.

Peter M. STERN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 29, 1987.

Decided June 3, 1987.

Paul J. Burgoyne, West Chester, for petitioner.

Arthur W. Lefco, Philadelphia, Harold Cramer, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

This Court, in response to the Report and Recommendation filed in this matter by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania ("Board"), has issued a Rule to Show Cause why…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Benson v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API