Legal Opinion
Ilic v. Peerless Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas A. Stander, J.
The Defendants, Peerless Insurance Company, Excelsior Insurance Company and The Netherlands Insurance Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as Defendants), submit a motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Plaintiffs Peter and Deborah Ilic’s complaint. The Defendants’ basis for *948this motion is that the declaratory judgment action of Plaintiffs for first-party insurance coverage for property damage was commenced after the policy’s two-year suit limitation.
The insurance claim is based upon water damage which occurred on February 8, 1993 to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Blitman Construction Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Schunk v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Carat Diamond Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Hoesen v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 1426 Wisconsin LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Penna v. Peerless InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007