Mcmahon v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion to 'set aside a verdict and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $300; the defendant moved to set aside said verdict and for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to law. The action is brought to recover damages for injuries sustained from an act of a fellow passenger on one of the defendant’s cars on the evening of the 31st day of December, 1905. From the evidence adduced by plaintiff upon the trial it appeared that the plaintiff, a young woman, with several companions, boarded one of the defendant’s cars traveling in a southerly direction; that she *243was seated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Flint v. Norwich & New York Transportation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1868
- Hawkins's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Thompson v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
- Koch v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Terrell v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Wachser v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910