Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Brubaker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 7, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Judge.

On motion made and granted pursuant to KRS 21.060(2) the Commonwealth appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict awarding the appellees $2,5381 in a land condemnation case.

The first complaint is that the three ■ persons who served as commissioners to fix the damages in county court, appearing as witnesses for the landowners at the trial in circuit court, testified to the amount they awarded in county court. Such testimony is, of course, incompetent as evidence in chief, but we need not consider either its competence or possibility of prejudicial effect in this case, because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. TyreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. FisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. WoolumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  3. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
  4. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  5. West Fork Clarks River Watershed Conservancy District v. RansbottomCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API