Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Sundance v. Moorcroft Ranch Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to District Court for Crook County, Hon. Richard H. Scott, Judge. The First National Bank of Sundance brought three cases against the Moorcroft Ranch Company, ánd the same company and James Millar, and the same company and George B. Thomas, respectively, to recover money due upon promissory notes, and secured an attachment upon certain real property. The attachments were afterwards, upon motion and hearing, dissolved by the judge of the district court in vacation.

Read the full summary

ERROR to District Court for Crook County, Hon. Richard H. Scott, Judge. The First National Bank of Sundance brought three cases against the Moorcroft Ranch Company, ánd the same company and James Millar, and the same company and George B. Thomas, respectively, to recover money due upon promissory notes, and secured an attachment upon certain real property. The attachments were afterwards, upon motion and hearing, dissolved by the judge of the district court in vacation. A motion was subsequently made, supported by affidavit, to vacate the order of dissolution. It was alleged in the affidavit…

1Opinion of the Court

Gboesbeck, Chiee.Justice.,

It appears from, .the record- that in the three eases, above •entitled, the First -National- Bank:of Sundance had secured orders of attachment against- .the defendants, -and. that the property of the Moorcroft-Ranch Company was seized thereunder. Motions were made to dissolve and discharge these attachments .as-to all-of the.'property attached,.which were heard by the judge of the district court in vacation, ..-under the power .expressly eonferred.by the statute, -Sec. -2910,--Rev. Stat. On this hearing, the attachments were dissolved by -the judge in vacation. •…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sutherlin v. Underwriters' AgencySupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  2. Schlemmer v. MyersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Anderson v. EnglehartWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ramsay Motor Co. v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Anderson v. MatthewsWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Riffle v. Sioux City & Rock Springs Coal Mining Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API