Legal Opinion

People v. Kelly

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1963PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

The order should be affirmed. However, some of the statements in the opinion of the intermediate court (former Appellate Part of Special Sessions) prompt us to elaborate somewhat on the jurisdictional and procedural questions there discussed.

The Appellate Part correctly held (see People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368) that the exclusionary doctrine of Mapp v. Ohio (367 U. S. 643) applies to criminal causes tried before the Mapp ruling. The court next stated that “ the absence of exception to the admissibility of the offending evidence in the trial court is not a bar to a review”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wilson v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. People v. SmootAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. James P. Carafas v. J. Edwin Lavallee, Warden, Auburn Prison, Auburn, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. People v. KellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Terry v. DennoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API