Legal Opinion

Gee v. Van Natta-Lynds Drug Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Nodaway Circuit Court. — How. A. D. Burnes, Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing the demurrer to the evidence. The mortgage under which interpleaders claim title is void as against appellant. Sanford v. Wheeler, 33 Am. Dec. 389; Ayers v. Husted, 15 Conn. 513; Bramhall v. Flood, 41 Conn. 71; Pattison v. Létton, 56 Mo. App. 325; Mokaska Mfg. Co. v. Steele, 36 Mo. App. 496; Bank v. Lime Co., 43 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Nodaway Circuit Court. — How. A. D. Burnes, Judge. (1) The court erred in refusing the demurrer to the evidence. The mortgage under which interpleaders claim title is void as against appellant. Sanford v. Wheeler, 33 Am. Dec. 389; Ayers v. Husted, 15 Conn. 513; Bramhall v. Flood, 41 Conn. 71; Pattison v. Létton, 56 Mo. App. 325; Mokaska Mfg. Co. v. Steele, 36 Mo. App. 496; Bank v. Lime Co., 43 Mo. App. 496; Galhreath v. Cook, 30 Ark. 417. (2) The mortgage is fraudulent and void because to the use of the mortgagor. Lodge v. Samuels, 50 Mo. 204; Gutta Percha Mfg. Co. v. Supply .Co.,…

1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, J.

The undisputed facts taken from appellant’s statement are as follows:

On June 20, 1902, the Van Natta-Lynds Drug Co. sued Greo„ Aley, Jr., on account for merchandise sold for $251.46 and obtained a writ of attachment in aid of said suit which was levied upon a stock of drugs belonging to the debtor, situated in his store at Quitman, Mo. Afterwards the respondents interpleaded for the goods, claiming the right to possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage executed to them by Aley, Jr. on March 25, 1902, to secure a note for $1,290. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. R. L. McDonald & Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Goodheart v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bramhall v. FloodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  4. Galbreath, Stewart & Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  5. Gutta Percha Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Kansas City Fire Department Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Arel v. First National Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API