Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Cotton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1984No. 1979 Philadelphia, 1982Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCirillo, Judge

I respectfully differ with the majority in that I would find the evidence insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant caused Mr. Markiw’s death, and would therefore reverse appellant’s conviction for second-degree murder. I would affirm the sentence for conspiracy and remand for resentencing on the robbery conviction, since the sentence for robbery merged with the life sentence for second-degree murder.

*31The test for sufficiency of the evidence is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth and drawing all proper inferences favorable to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. RootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. StaffordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. HicksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API