Legal Opinion

Hirrel v. Lacey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 4, 1931PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for the death of a boy, six and one half years of age, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendants.

There was evidence tending to show that the deceased child and his sister, about eight and one half years old, at about half past seven on an April morning left their home on the north side of Mystic Avenue in Medford and walked along a dirt and gravel sidewalk on that street about one hundred feet when they came to a driveway leading across the sidewalk into the defendants’ place of business; that the sister was on the outside of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Brooks v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Mercier v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Proctor v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Haun v. LeGrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Anderson v. Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Hess v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API