Legal Opinion

Browne v. Rice

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiegelmann, J.

The Department of Health heretofore seized and now holds for destruction a certain male Spitz dog belonging to petitioner. The alleged basis upon which the seizure was made, and its destruction is contemplated, is that the animal is of “ vicious ” character having bitten various persons upon three different occasions. Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 10 of the Sanitary Code if a dog is C( vicious to such an extent as to be unsafe to be at large, it shall be destroyed by said department.” It shall be deemed “ vicious ” according to a further provision of the ordinance if it “ has bitten a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Neddo v. SchradeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Kendel v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. ParsonsNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Smalls v. White Plains Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API