Browne v. Rice
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiegelmann, J.
The Department of Health heretofore seized and now holds for destruction a certain male Spitz dog belonging to petitioner. The alleged basis upon which the seizure was made, and its destruction is contemplated, is that the animal is of “ vicious ” character having bitten various persons upon three different occasions. Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 10 of the Sanitary Code if a dog is C( vicious to such an extent as to be unsafe to be at large, it shall be destroyed by said department.” It shall be deemed “ vicious ” according to a further provision of the ordinance if it “ has bitten a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Neddo v. SchradeNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Kendel v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board of Education v. ParsonsNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Smalls v. White Plains Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1962