Jay H. Floyd and Julia M. Floyd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This case presents a single question, whether the proceeds from the assignment by petitioners of certain in-oil payment rights constitute capital gain or ordinary income. All the facts are stipulated and are found in accordance with the stipulation.
The Tax Court held that the case cannot be distinguished from that of Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, 356 U.S. 260, 78 S.Ct. 691, 2 L.Ed.2d 743, and that the proceeds are taxable as ordinary income.
We agree with the Tax Court that this is so in this case and affirm its judgment.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donnell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
- United States v. Murphy J. Foster and Olive R. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Earl R. Wiseman, Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Oklahoma v. Ralph E. Barby and Marie Barby, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Carroll v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Donnell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.