Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Copeland
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 5, 1991No. 17614PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION
PARRISH, Judge.
This is an action in prohibition in which relator seeks to prohibit the respondent judge from granting a motion to intervene in case No. CV190-373CC in the Circuit Court of New Madrid County, Missouri. The motion to intervene was filed by Eddie Haynes and Scottie M. Haynes for the limited purpose of requesting the Circuit Court of New Madrid County to dismiss any claim on behalf of Eddie Haynes set forth in the petition in that case. A preliminary order in prohibition was entered. Rule 97.04. For the reasons that follow, that preliminary order…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sylcox v. National Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
- General Box Co. v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- McKenzie v. Missouri Stables, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Ruediger v. Kallmeyer Brothers ServiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Langston v. HaydenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Williamson v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bi-State Development Agency v. GurleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Menees v. National Super Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993