Legal Opinion

Post v. Mendel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1985No. 1639PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in response to a complaint in trespass filed by the plaintiff-appellant (Barton L. Post, Esquire). We affirm in part and quash in part.

We commence our discussion with the appellant’s filing of a 2-count amended complaint against the defendant-appellee (M. Mark Mendel, Esquire). The first count sounded in libel and the second in slander, and in each the plaintiff sought in excess of $20,000 for compensatory damages as well as an equal amount in punitive or exemplary damages.

In…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Robert L. Sullivan, D.D.S., P.C. v. BirminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Barto v. FelixSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Post v. MendelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Motheral v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Jones v. P.M.A. InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Danko Development Corp. v. Econocast Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Thompson v. SikovSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API