Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ogden v. Judge Sixth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1879No. 7091Published

^ PPLICATION for a mandamus.

1Opinion

Ok Rehearing.

When we said — in the opinion delivered on the 30th of December— that the rule filed by the district attorney was not before us, we meant —and it was a fact — that it did not accompany the transcript, and not— as erroneously supposed by the assistant prosecutor — that we could not have properly considered the same in passing upon the application evidenced by that rule. We looked for it after the submission of the case, but — when we did — it was not in the office of the clerk of this court, and this induced the remark made in the opinion, that thé only documents placed before us…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API