State ex rel. Ogden v. Judge Sixth Judicial District
Supreme Court of Louisiana
^ PPLICATION for a mandamus.
1Opinion
Ok Rehearing.
When we said — in the opinion delivered on the 30th of December— that the rule filed by the district attorney was not before us, we meant —and it was a fact — that it did not accompany the transcript, and not— as erroneously supposed by the assistant prosecutor — that we could not have properly considered the same in passing upon the application evidenced by that rule. We looked for it after the submission of the case, but — when we did — it was not in the office of the clerk of this court, and this induced the remark made in the opinion, that thé only documents placed before us…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890