Legal Opinion

Oldham v. McRoberts

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Lawless, J.

Defendant, H. Theodore McBoberts, moves for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint herein pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice on the ground that the complaint fails to state facts necessary to constitute a cause of action.

This action was commenced in this court in April, 1954. There are three separate causes of action pleaded. The first is brought by various stockholders of the Great Eastern Gas Corporation who each allege that he was damaged by virtue of fraud and deceit of the defendants who, as officers and directors of plaintiff corporation,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McRoberts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Verplanck v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Ross v. PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Thomas v. . BeebeNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. Dudley v. . ScrantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newin Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Snyder v. FagetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Snyder v. FagetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API