Legal Opinion
Lacy v. Lewis
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 12, 2000No. CV 99-1798 JSL (RC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LETTS, District Judge.
Having reviewed the papers filed in connection with this matter and being fully apprised of the relevant facts and law,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered granting a conditional writ of habeas corpus, based on petitioner DURNEL LACY’S first claim that the “trial court erred by denying petitioner’s motion for self-representation, violating his California and U.S. Constitutional rights.” The court did not reach the petitioner’s other claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nelson v. BiterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- State v. BaskinOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. GodleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. FrostOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.